Friday, March 2, 2018

Cryptocurrency discussions gaining steam in Illinois universities



Cryptocurrency discussions gaining steam in Illinois universities

  •  
  •  
FILE - Bitcoin, cryptocurrency
Shutterstock photo
Illinois universities are offering students more opportunities to learn about digital currencies such as bitcoin as interest in cryptocurrencies and the technology behind them grows.
Gib Bassett, head of the Finance Department at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said interest in the subject is driven as much by the students as it is the faculty.
“The students read about cryptocurrency a lot, and they are very interested in learning about its potential role in the economy,” Bassett said.
Bassett said he will have a class panel in April with members of the Chicago exchanges and will feature local digital currency experts.
“I am going to have a panel discussion with some local professionals in the industry who have been involved with initiatives regarding cryptocurrency,” Bassett said.
Bassett said his panel is just one discussion in an eight-part class, but he could one day see full special-topics classes being created to further discuss digital currency.
“I would not be surprised that both in finance departments and in computer science departments, the bitcoin and blockchain are going to become I’m sure full classes,” Bassett said.
Blockchain is the digital ledger distributed among numerous computers that tracks transactions of digital currencies and records them both publicly and chronologically. It is constantly growing and allows investors to keep track of transactions without a central recordkeeper, according to Investopedia.
Bassett said he was not sure about the future of digital currency and said he has heard mixed signals from people he has discussed it with. Some hold that digital currency is a bubble not worth investing in, he said.
“And on the other side, there are people who are equally intelligent who claim that bitcoin and even more so, blockchain, will be taking over the world,” Bassett said.

Case shines light on CIA propaganda tactics



Case shines light on CIA propaganda tactics

Lawyers working on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency argued this week that intelligence officials should have the right to selectively release classified information to journalists of its choosing while withholding the same information from other citizens.
New York based journalist Adam Johnson sued the CIA after he filed a Freedom of Information Act request for emails between agency officials and reporters working for major national news outlets including The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.
The CIA provided the emails but redacted their contents, leaving Johnson wondering why he couldn’t read information agency officials had already shared with other reporters lacking security clearance.
In his lawsuit, Johnson argues that the agency can’t claim a FOIA national security exemption on information it’s already shared with journalists.
The CIA argues that previous Supreme Court rulings grant it “broad discretion” and “sweeping power” in picking what information it will release to whom.
Chief Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York appears to agree with the CIA.
“In this case, CIA voluntarily disclosed to outsiders information that it had a perfect right to keep private,” she wrote. “There is absolutely no statutory provision that authorizes limited disclosure of otherwise classified information to anyone, including ‘trusted reporters,’ for any purpose, including the protection of CIA sources and methods that might otherwise be outed.”
The judge has, however, asked the CIA to further clarify its position on the matter.
“The fact that the reporters might not have printed what was disclosed to them has no logical or legal impact on the waiver analysis, because the only fact relevant to waiver analysis is: Did the CIA do something that worked a waiver of a right it otherwise had?” she added.
The really interesting thing to recognize here is that the CIA, an agency whose original purpose was manipulating the narrative in nations subject to U.S. hegemony, is playing the same game here with the help of mainstream media journalists who effectively serve as government PR pawns.

Thursday, March 1, 2018

The state weaponizes education to create ignorance

The state weaponizes education to create ignorance

This originally appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com on February 14, 2018.
A hundred fifty years ago, at least some Americans recognized that all serious discourse depended on the use of the faculty called Reason.
Formal debate, science, and law all flowed from that source.
A common bond existed in some schools of the day. The student was expected to learn how Reason operates, and for that he was taught the only subject which could lay out, as on a long table, the visible principles: Logic.
This was accepted.
But now, this bond is gone.
The independence engendered by the disciplined study of logic is no longer a desired quality in students.
The classroom, at best, has taken on the appearance of a fact-memorization factory; and we should express grave doubts about the relevance and truth of many of those facts.
A society filled with people who float in the drift of non-logic is a society that declines.
Ideologies that deny individual freedom and independence are welcomed with open arms.
When education becomes so degraded that young students are no longer taught to reason clearly, private citizens have the obligation rebuild that system so the great contribution to Western civilization—logic—is reinstated in its rightful place.
Logic, the key by which true political discourse, science, and law were, in fact, originally developed, must be unearthed.
Logic and reasoning, the capacity to think, the ability to analyze ideas — an ability which has been forgotten, which has been a surpassing virtue in every free civilization—must be restored.
Once a vital thing has been misplaced, buried, and covered over by mindless substitutions, people cannot immediately recognize the original thing has any importance, meaning, or existence.
To declare its importance makes no sense to “the crowd.” They look bewildered and shake their heads. They search their memories and find nothing.
They prefer to adhere to rumor, gossip, accusation, wild speculation, and fear mongering as the primary means of public discourse and assessment of truth.
These habits light their paths. These reflexes give them some degree of pleasure. These idols become their little gods.
To win out over such attachments and superstitions is a job for the long term.
But if our labors yield rewards, we can once again bring import to education, and to the idea of authentic freedom that once cut a wide swathe through darkness.
A string of direct and distracting abuses has saddled our schools. Among them:
* Teachers believe they need to entertain children, in order to capture their attention;
* School systems have substituted the need for public funds in the place of actually supplying a sound education;
* Under the banner of political correctness, school texts have been sanitized to the point of sterility, in order to avoid the possibility of offending, to the slightest degree, any group;
* Students rarely confront information in the form in which it is delivered to people all over the world—they confront substitutes;
* Students have, in this respect, been coddled;
* Subjects such as sex education, which belong in the family, have been delivered into the hands of schools and teachers;
* Indeed, in certain key respects, schools are asked to substitute and stand in for parents;
* Masked as “learning opportunities,” various political agendas have been inserted in school curricula;
* The basis on which every historic document establishing some degree of freedom was debated and drafted—logical thought—has been eliminated from the curriculum as a serious discipline;
* Students are permitted and even encouraged to drift and grasp at superficially attractive ideas and fads of the moment;
* In this respect, freedom has been reinterpreted to mean “mental incapacity and wandering thought”;
* The vast contributions of the ancient Greek civilization, where logic as a crucial subject was born, have been obliterated, minimized or summarized in sterile fashion;
* Logic, the connective tissue which binds together the progression of ideas in rational argument, has been kept away from students;
* The result is the production of shallow minds that cannot see the architecture of reasoning;
* Students, at sea, begin to invent wholly insufficient standards for accepting or rejecting various points of view and supposed authorities;
* Students lose their true independence without ever having gained it;
* The low level of overall literacy in our schools is matched only by the non-comprehension of rational thought;
In the presence of these and other deficiencies and abuses, students are pushed through, from grade to grade, graduation to graduation, as a bureaucratic function, regardless of their ability.
Therefore, citizens of good intent must offload this system. They must assume responsibility for teaching children the missing key to education.
Logic; the capacity to reason, to think lucidly; to separate sense from chatter; to discover deception and avoid being influenced by it; to remain free and independent from the shifting opinions of “the herd”; to maintain personal liberty in the face of every spurious enticement to abandon it; to come to grips with competitive sets of First Principles which will lead to freedom or slavery; these are the stakes in our time.
This is the crossroad.
Choose the path that can bring us the fulfillment of a worthy goal.
Choose reason over vacuous mindlessness.
We, who still know the power of the mind, and who understand how that power can be harnessed to shape independence and liberty, can bring, out of the dust of recent history, an education that truly trains the intellect.
Logic is the foundation of such an education.
If schools, which have become madhouses and factories and toxic medical dispensaries, will not teach it, we can teach it.

Half of Illinois Board of Higher Education’s $3.4 billion funding request is meant for pensions

Half of Illinois Board of Higher Education’s $3.4 billion funding request is meant for pensions

FILE - College lecture hall, professor, university, classroom
stock_photo_world | Shutterstock.com
While Illinois has seen a loss of it’s public university students over several years, the taxpayer cost per student is, in some cases, nearly double in Illinois what it is in other states, and one driving factor is the high taxpayer cost of higher education pensions.
During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing last week, Illinois Board of Higher Education Executive Director Al Bowman said over time Illinois has lost thousands of college enrollees.
“In 1991 we had 202,000 students enrolled in public universities,” Bowman said. “In 2014 we had 193,000. So we dropped 8,600.”
State Sen. Dan McConchie, R-Hawthorn Woods, said higher education is costing taxpayers per student in Illinois more than schools cost taxpayers in other states.
“We were, back in 2015, paying over $10,000 in state support per student [in Illinois],” McConchie said. “And I’m looking at Ohio, $5,100 per student, Wisconsin $5,200 per student.”
IBHE is asking for for $3.4 billion for public universities in the coming fiscal year that begins July 1, $1.7 billion of that would go to the university retirement system.
State Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, said that high pension cost is diverting dollars from other resources meant to attract students to Illinois schools.
“The money is being shunted,” Rose said. “It’s being shunted away from base operations, which frankly, are things like recruitment dollars to bring students to our institutions, quality of faculty, retention of faculty, it’s all being shunted into a different direction."
IBHE’s request also includes $20 million for capital construction projects to address immediate health and safety needs. But that’s only a portion of the overall capital needs Bowman said are looming.
Rose said the buildout universities underwent from years ago trying to be all things to all students is another cost for taxpayers to bear, something he said also makes tuition too expensive for Illinoisans.
Rose said, as the experts, IBHE needs to find solutions.

Romney to become the face of anti-Trump GOP

Romney to become the face of anti-Trump GOP

Failed 2012 presidential candidate and Governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney officially announced his intention to run for U.S. Senate in Utah. If he wins, Romney will likely become one of the Trump administration’s biggest critics in the GOP.
Romney, 70, released a short video Friday announcing his candidacy and promising to combat political extremism in Washington.
“Utah is a better model for Washington than Washington is for Utah,” Romney said.
At one point in the video, the candidate took what seemed a lot like a swipe at President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
“Utah welcomes immigrants from around the world,” he said. “Washington sends immigrants a message of exclusion.”
If it was a swipe at Trump, it certainly wouldn’t come as a surprise. Ahead of the 2016 presidential primary, remember, Romney flat out attacked Trump in a last ditch effort to block him from securing the GOP nomination.
“Here’s what I know: Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud,” Romney said at the time.
“His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University,” he added. “He’s playing members of the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House, and all we get is a lousy hat.”
Since becoming president, Trump has attempted to repay the favor. Late last year, Trump traveled to Utah in an effort to convince Sen. Orin Hatch not to give Romney a path to the Senate by retiring.
As POLITICO reported in December:
Romney has been preparing to run for Hatch’s seat on the long-held assumption that the 83-year-old would retire. Yet Hatch, the longest-serving Republican senator in history, is now refusing to rule out another campaign — a circumstance Romney’s infuriated inner circle blames squarely on the president. Their suspicions are warranted: Trump has sounded off to friends about how he doesn’t like the idea of a Sen. Romney.
The president’s mostly behind-the-scenes campaign to sway Hatch will burst into public view on Monday, when he arrives in Salt Lake City to hold a well-choreographed event designed to showcase his affection for the powerful Senate Finance Committee chairman.
Trump’s appearance is ostensibly official in purpose: He will announce his decision to reduce the size of Utah’s Bears Ears and Grand-Staircase Escalante national monuments, a cause that Hatch has championed. But it’s also undeniably political: to use the trappings of presidential power to get a veteran lawmaker to rethink his long anticipated plans to leave the Senate.
Romney in the Senate means a huge opportunity for the GOP establishment to anoint him as the opposition within the majority it needs to help push back against certain Trump policies.