Showing posts with label @sbalich @danproft @willcountynews1 @candaceowens @charliekirk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label @sbalich @danproft @willcountynews1 @candaceowens @charliekirk. Show all posts

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Caravan of Central American migrants is headed to the United States.




For the second time this year, a caravan of Central American migrants is headed to the United States.

The group took off from San Pedro Sula earlier this week, a city located in the northern part of Honduras. The caravan crossed into Guatemala on Wednesday and is expected to cross into Mexico as they travel to the U.S.’s southern border. Originally the group started off in the few hundreds, they are now around 4,000 people.
This latest migrant caravan is another example of leftist groups grandstanding off of desperation and poverty. The Northern Triangle region of Central America where El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras are located is one of the most violent areas of the world. Transnational organized criminal groups and violent street gangs destabilize these impoverished countries. This leaves massive parts of the population vulnerable and with little means to survive.
Unfortunately, local governments lack the capacity and at times, the political will, to address these challenges.
Just like the migrant caravan earlier this March, organizers of this march are weaponizing poor Central Americans. This caravan was organized by Bartolo Fuentes, a former Honduran legislator and member of the radical leftist Libre party. He was detained by Guatemalan authorities on Tuesday for illegally entering the country.
Libre is not a political party but a destabilizing movement. It was founded in 2011 by former President Manuel (Mel) Zelaya. In 2009, Zelaya was removed from power after repeated attempts to undermine the constitutional order and rule of law. Zelaya is an ally of socialist governments in Latin America like the Castro and Maduro regimes in Cuba and Venezuela.
Following Libre’s losses in the 2013 and 2017 presidential elections, Libre’s turned to a public campaign of generating turmoil and instability.
I travel to Honduras frequently and experienced the chaos firsthand. In 2013, I was an international observer for the presidential elections. I was at the electoral tribunal headquarters as the votes were being counted when Zelaya stormed in and held a press conference disputing the election result.
His claim was ridiculous, as polls had only closed hours before. But he had a personal interest in the election: His wife was the party’s candidate. She ended up losing, earning less than 30 percent of the overall vote.
Even though various international groups gave the election a clean bill of health, party activists and agitators protested the results for days afterwards, shutting down major streets and highways.
Later in 2015, I returned to Honduras for a business trip. I was preparing to leave my hotel when the military showed up and told us that thousands of demonstrators carrying burning torches were headed to the presidential palace, which was right next to the hotel. For hours, we were confined in the hotel while thousands of protesters shut down traffic at the height of rush hour.
This caravan antic is right out of the left’s disorder and chaos playbook. The timing before the U.S.’s midterm elections and the change of presidency in Mexico is not coincidental. It is also clear the caravan organizers are more interested in creating turmoil than the well-being of the migrants.
The journey through Central America and Mexico is full of hazards, and migrants are frequently robbed, sexually assaulted, and go for long stretches without eating. Some fall prey to human trafficking organizations. Women and children are particularly vulnerable to these crimes.
The problem here is not a lack of compassion for these people, but rather, the dangerous precedent created by allowing a massive caravan to arrive at the U.S.’s southern border. The U.S. immigration system is already stretched beyond capacity and must prioritize those who apply for asylum in good faith.
Source and transit countries in the region have a role to play in stemming these flows. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is traveling to Mexico on Friday to visit with his counterparts and address the crisis.
The U.S. must take action to secure its borders and faithfully enforce its law. Loopholes must be closed and adequate enforcement resources brought to bear. This can be done in a humane manner while also protecting those who truly qualify for asylum.

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Fighting Cowardly Institutional Tyranny



Fighting Cowardly Institutional Tyranny

Fighting Cowardly Institutional Tyranny
The anonymous op-ed published by The New York TimesWednesday is the most stunning proof we have seen so far of the liberal media’s aggressive bias and the very real efforts by parts of the institutional establishment to undermine the President, the U.S. Constitution, and the will of the American people.
In its fervor to attack the White House – and influence the midterm elections – The New York Times happily eschewed basic journalistic standards and offered its page and waning credibility to a nameless, disgruntled, elitist coward who seems to believe he or she has the moral authority to ignore and undermine the elected leader of the free world.
The paper’s editorial board clearly said it granted the writer anonymity to “deliver an important perspective” to readers and to protect the writer from losing his or her job. This is a naked endorsement of the subversive efforts described in the piece – The New York Timeswants the author to keep it up.

The collusion between this supposed senior administration official (who could be one of thousands of minor-but-experienced appointees) and the newspaper (which is the standard bearer of elite media power) is also clear evidence that members of the old guard, institutional establishment are working to protect old Washington power structures and prevent the changes that the American people elected President Trump to bring to our country.
In the op-ed, the writer even describes him- or herself as a member of “the steady state.” That’s a catchy name for group of would-be mutineers. In my New York Timesbestselling book Trump’s America: The Truth About Our Nation’s Great Comeback, I called them orderly institutionalist wing of the Anti-Trump coalition.
Don’t be fooled by their self-proclaimed patriotism, the members of this group are working on behalf of institutional processes – not the American people.
This op-ed is also a perfect depiction of the competing alternate reality the anti-Trump forces are trying to impose on the country.
If the President is so unhinged and incapable, why has North Korea said it wanted to work toward truly denuclearizing the peninsula? How is Trump and the Republican Party so close to seating a second constitutionally-focused Supreme Court Justice? How is the economy in its best shape in decades?
This coward who is hiding from the American people that pay his or her salary would have us believe the members of the so-called “steady state” are the ones achieving these goals – despite the fact that they’ve likely been in Washington for decades and were apparently incapable before President Trump took office.
This is egotistical, elitist Washington baloney.
Let’s be clear: This anonymous op-ed will do nothing to change anything about which its author complained. It will do nothing to quiet concerns that some Americans may have about the direction of the country. It will do nothing to help strengthen America on the world stage. It will only help fuel excitement for Democrats in November.
It is nothing but an extraordinary statement of arrogance from someone who didn’t run for office and won't even tell the American people his or her name.
The only honorable, lawful course of action for the author is to publicly resign.
If this supposed patriot wants to steer our country’s future, he or she should ask the American people for permission first.

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

If Republicans Want to Win, They'll Have to Stop Governing Like Democrats



If Republicans Want to Win, They'll Have to Stop Governing Like Democrats

David McIntosh
The Hill | 8/22/2018

“The liberal media keeps beating the drums that President Trump could cost Republicans their majorities in Congress.
“Not so fast. The Club for Growth PAC’s experience in running dozens of races in Republican primaries this year reveals the real problem. Republicans are in trouble because their own base is rejecting moderates who failed to uphold their promises to help President Trump roll back big government.

“We heard the same predictions in 2016 — Republicans would lose the Senate because Trump was at the top of the ticket. Instead, they kept control of the Senate and won 13 out of 18 toss-up House districts. These include the open seat in New York’s 19th Congressional District where Republican John Faso handily beat Zephyr Teachout by nine points. …

“How did they do it?

“They ran on a fiscally conservative platform that wooed many former Obama voters who were sick and tired of the waste, excess, and regulation of Obama’s reign. …

“But with the 2018 midterms less than three months away, the pundits predict that ‘Republicans will lose 40 to 50 House seats.’ Almost all of these seats are represented by moderates who have dragged their feet on implementing President Trump’s mandates. Their average on the Club for Growth Scorecard on economic issues is a mere 64 percent — basically a D+ at best.

“What changed?

“Over the past two years, so-called moderate congressional Republicans abandoned their conservative campaign promises and sided with Democrats. From repealing ObamaCare, to passing a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill that ensures perennial $1 trillion deficits, these Republicans forced the Republican-controlled Congress to break many of its core campaign promises.  

“John Faso, for example, ran as a frugal fiscal conservative in his open-seat race, promising to ‘fight to lower taxes to help create jobs.’ …

“After being sworn into Congress, however, John Faso the congressman didn’t look anything like John Faso the candidate. Instead of cutting taxes and simplifying the tax code, Faso voted against President Trump’s signature tax cuts (RC #699, 2017). Instead of living up to his self-proclaimed frugality, Rep. Faso couldn’t muster the frugality to support a mere one percent spending cut (RC #251, 2018). …

“New York’s 19th district is a lean-Republican seat (R+2 on the Cook Partisan Voting Index) that handed Trump a six-point victory, but Faso is voting like a Democrat on fiscal issues. In 2017, Rep. Faso earned a meager 24 percent on the Club for Growth’s scorecard — the worst Republican score in the House of Representatives.

“Republicans like Rep. Faso have a problem on their hands: The GOP is treating voters as if they’re stupid — but they are not. Voters are smart. They know what candidate Faso promised: to change Washington. And they know what he did: jump on the DC swamp bandwagon.

“Similarly, take a look at the special election in Ohio’s 12th congressional district, where moderate Republican Troy Balderson who supported funding Medicaid expansion barely eked out a victory over Democrat Danny O’Connor. …
“But this special general election race never should have been this close. The 12th district has an R+7 Cook Partisan Voting Index rating and was easily held by Republicans for 30-plus years. 

“Republican and independent voters are sending a message — they are rejecting establishment orthodoxy — that it is not OK to run as a conservative and govern as a moderate.

“Time and again, Republicans have failed to learn this important lesson. If Republicans want to hang onto their House majority, the single most important thing they can do is start acting like conservatives.
“It’s time for Republicans to learn this lesson before it’s too late.”

Saturday, September 8, 2018

Mad Money from Madigan in Illinois




With election season upon us, one man’s face will fill the mailboxes of Illinoisans more than any other. His visage will flash across screens constantly. Low voices will utter his name over radio waves.

Of course, I’m talking about the longest-serving state House speaker in American history, Mike Madigan.
The man is widely despised, yet he retains extraordinary power. That puts quite a few Democratic representatives in a trick bag.
The candidates facing the toughest races need cash to keep the lights on. But with the most unpopular politician in the state holding the purse strings for the party, that money isn’t “clean.” There is a price to pay.
Madigan is the chairman of the Democratic Party of Illinois and controls its campaign spending. He is the only legislative leader in the country who is also a state party chairman. He’s also chairman of three other active committees: Friends of Michael J. Madigan, the 13th Ward Democratic Association and Democratic Majority.
More than 60 sitting state representatives have received money from one or more of those committees over the course of their careers, totaling around $15 million. And many of the top recipients find themselves in tough races this fall.
Incumbent state Rep. Sam Yingling, D-Grayslake, tops the table among those running for a seat. He’s received nearly $1.5 million in donations and in-kind contributions from Madigan’s committees. State Rep. Carol Sente, D-Vernon Hills, is the only sitting lawmaker who has received more, but she’s not seeking re-election.
The following state representatives running for re-election have received more than half a million dollars from Madigan’s committees:
  • Sam Yingling, D-Grayslake ($1,493,600)
  • Deb Conroy, D-Villa Park ($1,313,932)
  • Marty Moylan, D-Des Plaines ($981,242)
  • Fred Crespo, D-Hoffman Estate ($895,336)
  • Sue Scherer, D-Decatur ($892,609)
  • Katie Stuart, D-Edwardsville ($869,501)
  • Michelle Mussman, D-Schaumburg ($869,089)
  • Stephanie Kifowit, D-Oswego ($732,852)
  • Kathleen Willis, D-Addison ($588,821)
  • Natalie Manley, D-Joliet ($535,940)
Two things to note about these dollar amounts: First, they are only up to date as of June, when candidates filed their most recent campaign finance reports with the Illinois State Board of Elections. Madigan’s spent plenty more since then.
Second, they don’t capture the dollars funneled to candidates by other organizations at Madigan’s behest.  The speaker has directly funded 10 members of his caucus running for re-election with over half a million dollars each, but that by no means is the only way he provides support to candidates. In districts where his name is particularly toxic, he can direct loyal lieutenants – most commonly labor unions – to fund candidates directly.
Madigan’s money itself might not be a problem for some state lawmakers. Of course, on the other side of the aisle, Gov. Bruce Rauner heavily funds the Republican Party, which then backs candidates in tough races. He is also unpopular at the moment. But there is a key difference.
No other state gives its House speaker so much power over the legislative process. And Madigan just needs one vote every two years to retain that iron grip: the vote for speaker.
Each lawmaker who has received more than half a million dollars from Madigan has, in exchange, dutifully given him that key vote. Collectively, they’ve cast 36 speaker votes for the man who’s held the gavel for 34 years.
Madigan gives money to lawmaker. Lawmaker gives ultimate power to Madigan. The campaign mailers write themselves.
Some lawmakers have yet to feel the pressure that comes with an influx of Madigan cash. Take Natalie Phelps Finnie, for example, who was appointed to her cousin’s Democratic House seat in southern Illinois last year and has received less than $1,000 from Madigan committees. As the Democratic Party tries to hold on to that seat in a district that overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump in 2016, one can expect money from the speaker to flow into the district one way or another.
As that happens, calls for independence from the speaker’s money will surely only grow louder within her district – as they will throughout the state.
Will she, or others, give in to that pressure? Not if history is any indicator. After all, the Democratic state representatives who do usually add “former” to their job title soon after.

Austin Berg
Director of Content Strategy

Monday, August 27, 2018

Illinois homeowners sinking underwater on mortgages

 
Voting for Democrats over and over is like asking the people that were on the Titanic if they would vote to hit the iceberg knowing the result.

Keeping the same Democrat Party that caused the problem in power with your vote is the definition of asking to maintain everything that will sink Illinois. 

Make sure you vote and bring a friend. Every vote counts!                                                                 Fix our State Vote Republican.


Steve Balich Editors Note: 
As property taxes increase so does the value of your home and the money you have left to spend from your pay check. Your disposable income is also taking a hit when sales tax and fees are increased. Bottom line, The more the government takes the less you have. With increased demand from government taking more and more of your hard earned money every way they can think of many people find it difficult to pay their mortgage. For those on a fixed income, the government is forcing some out of their homes.




More Illinois homeowners sinking underwater on mortgages

·         FILE - Chicago suburb, house, property taxes
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Illinois has more homeowners with mortgages that are higher than what their homes could fetch on the market than nearly any other state – and the problem is getting worse.

In the second quarter of 2018, 18 percent of Illinois’ homes were considered seriously underwater, or mortgaged for more than 25 percent of the potential sale price of the house. That’s according to ATTOM Data Solutions’ report released Thursday. That’s higher than it has been since 2016. In some of Chicago's western suburbs, more than 70 percent of homeowners owe 25 percent more than the price their home would sell for.
The national average for the second quarter was 10 percent.
Many of those areas are seeing big home value deficits because buyers pulled the trigger at the height of home prices. Geneva (76.0 percent); Elgin (75.5 percent); St. Charles (73.6 percent); and Sugar Grove (71.9 percent) were behind only Springfield, Missouri, in terms of percentage of residents more than 25 percent underwater on their homes.
“Even though those markets are recovering and home prices are coming back slowly, they haven’t recovered the equity loss during the downturn,” ATTOM vice president Daren Blomquist said.
Twelve of the top 20 markets for percentage of seriously underwater homes were in Illinois.

State
County
City
Population
Units
Underwater x 125%
Percentage
Missouri
Greene
Springfield
11,867
4,768
2,443
81.0%
Illinois
Kane
Geneva
29,127
10,579
6,514
76.0%
Illinois
Kane
Elgin
20,761
7,209
4,843
75.5%
Illinois
Kane
Saint Charles
26,334
8,427
5,325
73.6%
Illinois
Kane
Sugar Grove
11,877
4,287
2,566
71.9%
New Jersey
Mercer
Trenton
25,906
9,815
2,354
71.5%
Missouri
Greene
Springfield
22,857
9,448
3,840
71.5%
Illinois
Kane
Elburn
10,169
3,636
2,093
71.2%
Missouri
Jasper
Webb City
14,635
6,139
1,953
70.3%
Illinois
Kane
Saint Charles
31,047
12,850
5,477
67.6%
Illinois
Kane
Batavia
29,502
11,233
5,087
66.7%
Illinois
Kane
Dundee
15,705
6,490
2,849
66.2%
Pennsylvania
Clearfield
Du Bois
19,266
9,496
2,133
66.1%
Missouri
Greene
Republic
18,037
7,278
2,932
65.5%
Illinois
Kane
Hampshire
15,985
6,040
3,134
65.4%
Missouri
Saint Louis
Saint Louis
20,460
8,779
3,080
65.4%

Losses in population, seen in nearly every county in Illinois in 2017 Census reports, tend to push home values down since the demand for homes is slowed.
“It even makes it tougher for those who still own homes there to recover equity and, in fact, you may see them lose equity,” Blomquist said.
The city of Peoria, which saw the biggest percentage of population loss in 2017, had 46 and 29 percent of homes in it’s two zip codes register as seriously underwater.  
High property taxes, something notorious to Illinois, will suppress home values, pushing a homeowner further under, Blomquist said.
Homeowners underwater on their mortgages will also be hesitant to sell their homes since they would have to afford the difference between the lien and the sale price. This will leave homeowners chained to their residence that they may want to vacate.
The statewide median price in June was $225,000, up 4.5 percent from June 2017, according to Illinois Realtors.

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Grocery stores across Illinois are closing. Why?




Grocery stores across Illinois are closing. Why?

·       FILE - Closed grocery store

Tim Gray | Shutterstock.com




Top of Form
Bottom of Form
In the past year, grocery stores in Clinton, Moline, Effingham, Kankakee and several Chicago suburbs have closed and two more in central Illinois are slated to close by the end of this month.
Two Kroger grocery stores are slated to close later this month, one in Decatur and another in Lincoln. Statements from Kroger corporate says the stores weren’t expected to return to profitability.
“Company leaders praised the stores’ associates, saying the closings are not a reflection on them or their work,” a statement from Kroger said. “The 76 members of the Kroger team in Lincoln have performed extremely well and have been committed to customer service in spite of the business challenges experienced by their store.”
A statement from Kroger about the Decatur closing said customers will still be able to shop, fill prescriptions and get fuel at two other locations in the central Illinois community.
“The HR team will strive to find other positions for the (95) store associates at the other Decatur Kroger stores,” the statement said.
Illinois Retail Merchants Association President Rob Karr said while each business is unique, there may be one commonality.
“No longer are companies willing to subsidize underperforming stores,” Karr said. “If stores aren’t meeting their targets, aren’t meeting what they need to meet the needs of the companies, then they are more likely to close them than to subsidize them with more profitable stores.”
Karr said people trending to eat out more could be another reason. But he said the grocery business lives on the narrowest margins where there’s very little room for error amid intense competition. But there’s another factor, he said.
“We can’t overlook the fact, and people tend to roll their eyes sometimes, but it’s real, the combined impact of local government and state government’s pressures on business also impacts them negatively,” Karr said.
State reports through the Illinois Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act indicate since July 2017, at least 17 grocery stores or food retailers have closed throughout the state, impacting around 1,660 employees and countless consumers.
Snap Kitchen, billed online as a “one stop healthy meal shop,” closed seven locations in Chicago in December 2017 affecting 76 employees.
Several months ago, multiple Sam’s Club stores closed in the Chicago suburbs: Wheeling with 138 employees, Streamwood with 191 employees, Matteson affecting 166 workers, Naperville with 170 employees, Batavia with 150 employees, Moline with 155 and Romeoville with 167.
In other parts of the state, Walmart in Clinton with 80 workers is set to close by the end of the month. Martin’s IGA in Effingham closed, affecting 275 in January 2018. Ultra Foods in Kankakee closed in September 2017 affecting 92 employees.
While more urban areas may have access to other grocery choices, things get more difficult in rural areas where the Rural Health Information Hub says “access to food may be limited by financial constraints or other factors, such as transportation challenges.”
“Rural shoppers may rely on more expensive and less nutritious options, such as those available at gas station convenience stores, or face a long drive to a town with a grocery store that stocks fresh produce, milk, eggs, and other staples,” it said.